Pilot: the first sellers get a free verified listing. No payment is taken on this site.试点期:首批卖家免费获得核验挂牌。本站不收取任何费用。 Apply →立即申请 →
Example · not for sale示例 · 非在售 AI tools

Replywise

Draft customer replies that still sound like your team.起草仍像你团队口吻的客户回复。

Example listing — not for sale. All figures, the seller story and the business itself are fictional. This page shows what a verified ProofMarket listing will look like.示例挂牌 — 非在售。所有数据、卖家故事及项目本身均为虚构。本页用于展示 ProofMarket 核验挂牌的样子。

Financial summary财务摘要

MRR
$4,200
Monthly profit月利润
$2,700
Owner hours业主工时
8 h/wk小时/周
Age运营时长
16 months个月

Asking multiple: ≈2.1× trailing annual profit. Trailing annual profit ≈ $32,400.要价倍数:约等于近一年利润的 2.1 倍。近一年利润约 $32,400。

Cost breakdown成本明细

LLM API (OpenAI)$820
Hosting (Vercel + Railway)$95
Vector DB$60
Stripe$140
Email$35
Monitoring$50
Misc SaaS$100
Total monthly costs$1,300

Implied monthly profit $4,200 − $1,300 = $2,900 (listing shows rounded owner profit of $2,700).隐含月利润 $4,200 − $1,300 = $2,900(挂牌展示圆整后业主利润 $2,700)。

Owner workload业主工作量

Heavier than other examples: ~5 hours on support and prompt tuning, ~2 hours on infra/cost watch, ~1 hour on onboarding calls for larger teams (optional). Model price changes need monitoring.比其他示例更重:约 5 小时支持与提示调优,约 2 小时基础设施/成本盯盘,约 1 小时大客户可选入驻通话。需关注模型价格变化。

Tech stack技术栈

  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Postgres
  • pgvector
  • OpenAI API
  • Stripe
  • Vercel
  • Railway

Customers & retention客户与留存

186 workspaces. Top customer = 9% of MRR (usage-based overage). Gross margin after LLM ≈64%. Monthly logo churn ~5%. Expansion from seat adds is healthy. Customers: Shopify brands and B2B SaaS support teams.186 个工作区。最大客户占 MRR 9%(用量超额)。扣除 LLM 后毛利率约 64%。月 logo 流失约 5%。席位扩张健康。客户:Shopify 品牌与 B2B SaaS 支持团队。

No fine-tuned custom model — all prompts + retrieval. Fine-tuning could be upside for a technical buyer.无自研微调模型——全靠提示词与检索。对技术型买家,微调可能是上行空间。

Handover checklist交接清单

  • API keys rotated; usage caps documentedAPI 密钥轮换;用量上限已文档化
  • Prompt library + eval set (golden replies)提示词库 + 评测集(黄金回复)
  • 30-day transition with weekly cost review30 天过渡,每周复盘成本
  • SOC2 not started — buyer should plan if selling to enterprise未启动 SOC2 — 若面向企业需买家自行规划
  • Intercom replacement is native inbox — no Intercom dependency原生收件箱,不依赖 Intercom

Seller story卖家故事

Replywise grew from a side project helping our own support queue. AI costs are the main variable. I’m selling because a conflicting full-time offer starts soon and I won’t half-maintain an AI product. Buyer should be comfortable watching token spend.Replywise 源于帮助自己支持队列的副业。AI 成本是主要变量。出售是因为即将开始有冲突的全职工作,不愿半吊子维护 AI 产品。买家需能盯住 token 支出。